Am I The Bolas? - Stat Tracking in a Casual Game

Bureaucracy Illustrated by Mark Zug
Hello, and welcome to Am I the Bolas?
This column is for all of you out there who have ever played some Magic and wondered if you were the bad guy. I'm here to take in your story with all of its nuances so I can bring some clarity to all those asking, "Am I the Bolas?"
I'm ready to hear you out and offer advice. All you have to do is email amithebolas@gmail.com with your story, a pseudonym you want to use, and of course, only include details you don't mind in the column! You might see your story in the column. You might even hear it on the podcast. Which podcast?
I'm Mike Carrozza, aka Mark Carbonza, and sometimes, ya just gotta laugh!
Is it Halloween yet?
This week, a group's dynamic is wrecked by numbers.
(Post edited for brevity, clarity, and then some.)
HELLO, MIKE
HOWDY, DANIEL!
Thank you for writing in and asking me to weigh in on your story. As I mention every week, if folks don't write to me, there's no column, so if you, the reader, want to send me a story, whether it's your own or one from Reddit or a friend's, please send it to amithebolas@gmail.com and I'll get to it here.
Ouh! A submission that mentions no specific deck! All social elements, very interesting case!
There are few things that stand out to me in this one:
- The other two players are questioning the host's judgement.
- "Look at how he reacts when he isn't winning"
- Focusing removal on you to be essentially a non-participant
I think it's fair for you to want to pull back from a dynamic where you are actively being pushed away. The games are meant to be casual, but the moment statistics and numbers come into decision-making to secure a win, isn't that what competition is all about?
Having the stats is just an interesting thing to glance at, but the second they become the reason for anything in-game, I'm less keen on tracking them, too. While it's being used to point you out as the biggest winner, it's also clearly being used as somewhat of a shield for the host who is likeliest to "benefit" from this. That said, what's the benefit even? Winning more? Cool? That doesn't seem to be the priority for the rest of the pod.
I think the biggest flag for me is the statement "look at how he reacts when he isn't winning". It's dismissive and disrespectful. It's totally fair to not want to keep playing when that's how you're being treated when bringing a concern to the group. You're being targeted for having the highest win rate, which isn't something you can really argue with, and that sucks! A fact, checked by the data, is the excuse to forego the fun for everybody element and instead is used as the top reason for threat assessment that cannot be denied.
I believe, considering the other two players are perceived to be confused by the host's actions toward you, it'd be a good idea to bring it up to the group and ask how they all like or dislike it. I would also recommend doing so outside of a game. Discussing the impact of the stats as its own thing, removed from a game itself, should be a cleaner slate to work from to get anywhere.
That said, if there's no change to the host's behavior around the stats and actions due to them, definitely take a break or see if the others feel similarly. Not to exclude anybody, but if you all agree that it's not fun and they press the issue, then what are we doing here?
Not the Bolas. Keep your peace of mind. Take breaks from the game and groups as you need them. It's totally fair!